Skip to content

Breaking News

This undated image provided by the Los Alamos National Laboratory shows the Quonset hut where the bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki was assembled.
This undated image provided by the Los Alamos National Laboratory shows the Quonset hut where the bomb that was dropped on Nagasaki was assembled.
PUBLISHED: | UPDATED:

LOS ALAMOS, N.M. — Tucked away in one of northern New Mexico’s pristine mountain canyons is an old log cabin that was the birthplace not of a famous person but, rather, a top-secret mission that forever changed the world.

Pond Cabin, along with a nearby small, stark building where a person died while developing the nuclear bomb, is among a number of structures scattered in and around the modern-day Los Alamos National Laboratory that are being proposed as sites for a new national park commemorating the Manhattan Project.

It’s an odd place for a national park, many admit. Besides the fact that some of the sites are behind the gates to what is supposed to be one of the most secure research facilities in the world, nuclear critics have called the plan an expensive glorification of an ugly chapter in history.

“It is a debasement of the national parks idea,” Greg Mello, co-founder of the anti-nuclear watchdog Los Alamos Study Group, said when the Interior Department two years ago recommended creating national parks at Los Alamos, Hanford, Wash., and Oak Ridge, Tenn.

He remains opposed to the plan, saying it will not provide a comprehensive picture of the Manhattan Project, and he notes that extensive interpretative museums concerning development of the nuclear bomb already exist.

Supporters, however, note that good or bad, the Manhattan Project transformed history. And they argue that key sites that have not already been bulldozed should be preserved and the public should be allowed to visit them.

“It isn’t glorifying anything,” says Ellen McGehee, historical facilities manager for LANL. “It’s really more a commemoration. … History is what it is. We can’t pick and choose what’s historically significant.”

The Park Service, she said, would help people learn about the controversies, the people, and the social, political and military legacy surrounding the development of nuclear weapons.

“There are a lot of emotions rolled up in this story,” she said. “That’s why the Park Service is the best entity to tell this story. They can approach it as an outsider. They have no real interest in how it is told. They can tell it from a national perspective.”

Among the proposed park’s biggest supporters are lab workers such as McGehee. Since an act was passed in 2004 to study creation of such parks, she has been working to help identify and preserve areas in town and within lab property to include.

Potential park properties include some buildings in downtown Los Alamos, a town essentially created to support the lab, as well as 17 buildings in six “industrial sites” within the lab’s fence. They include the V-site, where the first atomic bomb to be detonated at the Trinity Site was assembled, as well as the areas where the Little Boy and Fat Man nuclear bombs that were dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, respectively, were assembled.